Priority Activities
|
Year-end update
|
Negotiate an agreement for the provision of insured services with government that is fair to physicians and provides value for patients; and restores physicians, through the AMA as an active partner in the health system.
|
- In January, the parties entered into interest-based negotiations as a way to move forward discussions for a provincial master agreement. The parties reached a tentative agreement after many months of discussions in late-August.
- Following a special meeting of the Representative Forum, the tentative agreement was sent out for ratification through a President’ Letter to the membership on September 9th, with voting to open on September 13th and close on September 28th. Three virtual townhalls have been planned to discuss the tentative agreement with the membership.
- Work on the lawsuit continues until government repeals Section 40.2 of the AHCIA.
|
Support members in local compensation discussions and through the provincial framework development including AHS-paid stipends, Physician on-call, contractual arrangements for Laboratory, DI and Cancer Care other physician AHS-contracted services.
|
- The AMA has contracted several experienced ARP consultants to assist physicians with immediate clinical ARP exploration, development and implementation needs.
- Several physician groups have requested and received assistance with stipend discussions with AHS and/or cARP discussion with AH. As stipends have once again been extended, this area continues to be an area of greater focus and resource requirements for AMA Health Economic staff.
- On April 1, 2022, AMA-AH released a joint statement to halt any pending changes to physician compensation rates or programs until negotiations conclude. With respect to stipends, those with arrangements extended to March 31, 2022 will now be extended to June 30, 2022, to facilitate talks.
- On June 21, 2022, AMA-AH released a second joint statement regarding pending changes to AHS stipends and overhead that were previously extended until June 30, indicating there would be no action taken on June 30th as negotiations are still in progress.
- The AMA has also hired a consultant to determine the optimal resourcing, structure and methods for providing AMA representation and support to physicians in all non-fee-for-service payment arrangements. This includes clinical ARPs, Academic Medicine, and Health Services Program (AMHSP), AHS payment arrangements, new ARP models, and any new contract payment arrangements arising out of Bill 30.
|
Support members in local clinical ARP discussions and through provincial framework development considering contractual, sessional, or capitation-based ARPs.
|
- Several physician groups have requested and received assistance with stipend discussions with AHS and/or cARP discussions with AH. As stipends have once again been extended, this area continues to be an area of greater focus and resource requirements for AMA Health Economics staff.
- A physician-led committee (AMA SAC) was also assembled to address, at a provincial level, the concerns expressed by various physician groups being impacted by changes in AHS stipend arrangements. Progress updates intended to keep membership informed have been developed and available on the AMA website (member login required) and will continue as new information arises.
- On April 1, 2022, AMA-AH released a joint statement to halt any pending changes to physician compensation rates or programs until negotiations conclude. With respect to stipends, those with arrangements extended to March 31, 2022, will now be extended to June 30 to facilitate talks.
- On June 21, 2022, AMA-AH released a second joint statement regarding pending changes to AHS stipends and overhead that were previously extended until June 30, indicating there would be no action taken on June 30th as negotiations are still in progress.
- AMA had some limited engagement in the Invictus ARP rate review project discussions with AH and Invictus, and have recommended a number of important components to the review, for example, to update cARP rates according to intra-provincial comparison of similar working physicians billing FFS - and are awaiting results from that review. AMA will continue to raise awareness on the complexities in physician payments and the current challenges.
|
Support academic physicians in the negotiation of the Academic Health Services Plan and the supporting Individual Services Agreement.
|
- The AMA’s AMHSP Council continued to focus on providing the perspective of academic medicine physicians to Alberta Health, the Faculties of Medicine and AHS. In May 2022, AMA AMHSP Council representatives presented AMHSP negotiations interests to Alberta Health, the Faculties of Medicine and AHS. These interests were previously developed by Council and have been discussed with the parties in the past, although representatives were different at the time. Follow-up discussions with the parties continue.
- Guided by the previously prepared negotiations interests and AMA member survey results relating to conditions of work, Council continued to press for engagement in AMHSP policy work related to FTE, clinical compensation rates, included/excluded work, working environment, and other areas impacting AMHSP physicians and their compensation. A consultant was hired in March 2022 to refresh and update these interests (originally developed in 2020).
- As part of ongoing refreshment and renewal of membership, five new members were appointed to the AMHSP Council and three members were re-elected.
|
Support members that are affected by Bill 30 and contracting out of physician services.
|
- The AMA has recommended to government the following principles around third party contracting:
- All third-party arrangements must continue to support a strong and vibrant public health care system.
- Funding from the Physician Services Budget should flow to the physician who is then free to negotiate the local terms and conditions of a contract with the third party. Much like how this works with ARPs, the physician(s) could choose to assign their billings to the third party in exchange for administrative or other services negotiated between the parties.
- Physicians could use established payment mechanisms (i.e., FFS, ARPs) along with the established payment rates and workload measures. In addition, groups should have the ability to advance payment/workload models that currently do not exist (e.g., case rate).
- A contract with a group should not prevent or inhibit others from being able to practice in Alberta.
- AMA representation of physician groups.
- Laboratory physicians have requested support and formal representation though the AMA. A Laboratory Physician Representation Group (LPRG) was formed to represent the interests of laboratory physicians in all matters related to the reorganization of community laboratory services. The LPRG includes some physicians currently under contract to DynaLife and those who could potentially come under contract.
|